Tier 3 · Compliant
Distribution & Logistics

Transport,
tracked and defensible.

Type 11 distributor and Type 13 transport-only compliance — manifests, vehicle protocols, driver qualifications, inventory holds, and transfer-tax compliance.

What we own

The QA gatekeeper role,
built to survive an audit.

A California distributor is the single regulatory choke point in the supply chain. Cultivators and manufacturers cannot move their own product to retail; everything passes through a Type 11 distributor that arranges representative sampling, holds the batch in quarantine, runs the quality-assurance review under CCR 15307, and releases pass-only product onto a CCR 15311 manifest. The work that goes wrong is almost never the truck — it’s the QA review handed off as a checklist instead of a documented decision, the “representative” sample collected by warehouse staff instead of by the licensed lab, the hub arrival logged in METRC ninety seconds before checkout, the manifest edited after the driver was already on the road. METRC transfers are the most commonly audit-failed workflow in the entire California system, and we own that surface end to end.

Concretely, we rebuild four interlocking systems. The METRC transfer stack — outgoing transfers from cultivators and manufacturers, incoming-transfer acceptance protocols, hub arrive/check-in/check-out/depart logging, PDF manifest generation, driver and vehicle registration through the transporter facility — wired so the physical truck and the METRC record cannot drift apart. The representative-sampling and chain-of-custody protocol per the DCC distributor sampling checklist, with the licensed Type 8 lab (never the distributor) collecting the sample on premises and the test sample package created in METRC with a traceable ID. The Type 11 QA review under CCR 15307 covering the COA panels (cannabinoids, terpenes, residual solvents, residual pesticides, heavy metals, microbials, mycotoxins, moisture, water activity, foreign material) plus the packaging and label match against CCR 15407–15412 and the ±10% potency tolerance under CCR 15724. And the pass/fail/destroy/remediate decision tree with the remediation@cannabis.ca.gov pre-approval pathway when a manufacturer is the right destination instead of destruction.

Where we stop: commercial relationships, pricing, customer selection, route economics, fleet procurement, and any owner-level negotiations. When the matter touches counsel territory — contested CDTFA assessments, retailer or manufacturer contract disputes, carrier litigation, an Order to Show Cause, or any administrative hearing — we coordinate with your retained counsel rather than running parallel. One record, one named coordinator, one defensible chain of custody from cultivator dock to retail shelf.

By the numbers

California distribution & logistics,
as it actually runs.

Figures from CCR Title 4 Division 19 (§ 15307 QA review, § 15311 transport and manifests, § 15042–15047 storage and surveillance), BPC 26070 distributor obligations, the post-AB 195 CDTFA framework, and the METRC v2 transfers and hub endpoints. METRC transfers are the most commonly audit-failed workflow in the entire California system — verify against the DCC distributor sampling checklist before any batch release decision.

CCR 15311
Manifest-to-product rule
Manifest-to-product mismatch is the most commonly audit-failed METRC workflow in California. What ships, what’s on the manifest, and what METRC shows all have to match on every handoff — scan-on-load on the shipper side, scan-on-receive before the driver departs.
CCR 15307
QA review under Type 11
Type 11 distributors must conduct a documented QA review before retail release — lab panels, packaging, label-to-COA match within the ±10% tolerance under CCR 15724. One of DCC’s most-inspected functions; sloppy review risks license revocation.
15%
Excise tax under AB 564
AB 195 eliminated the cultivation tax effective July 1, 2022; AB 564 set the 15% excise tax collected at retail (not distribution) effective Oct 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028. Distributor invoicing must align to the post-AB 195 framework or every quarterly reconciliation surfaces accumulated errors.
BPC 26070
Distributor-obligation statute
Type 11 covers storage, transportation, arranging testing, QA review, and distribution to retail. Type 13 is transport-only between licensees with no QA, no extended storage, no retail delivery. Operating beyond your scope is an immediate license violation, not an amendment.
The work, end to end

Named milestones.
Named owners.

  1. Week 1
    Current-state audit
  2. Week 2
    Manifest SOP rewrite
  3. Week 3
    Vehicle & driver compliance
  4. Week 4
    Test hold & excise
  5. Week 5
    Handoff & mock drill
The cost of getting it wrong

The four distributor failures
that become citations.

Every figure below is sourced to the DCC, the CDTFA, or the governing regulation. METRC transfers are the most commonly audit-failed workflow in California — these are the four patterns behind that finding.

METRC

Manifest-to-METRC drift

Quantities shipped don’t match the electronic manifest or the receiving retailer’s scan-on-receive — often because a transfer was edited in METRC after the physical handoff, or the driver left before the recipient accepted in their integration. The most common single distributor audit finding. (CCR 15311)

QA

QA review treated as a checkbox

The Type 11 QA review under CCR 15307 is supposed to be a documented decision with a named reviewer. Routinely passing mislabeled product to retail risks license revocation — a label-to-COA mismatch outside the ±10% potency tolerance under CCR 15724 is the single most common defect surfaced during inspection. (CCR 15307)

CDTFA

Post-AB 195 regime not repapered

AB 195 eliminated the cultivation tax (July 1, 2022); AB 564 set the 15% retail-collected excise (Oct 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028). Distributors that still issue legacy invoice formats trigger CDTFA follow-up at every quarterly reconciliation, with accumulated errors compounding retroactively. (CDTFA cannabis tax)

Hub

Hub dwell time too short to be plausible

The METRC hub workflow logs arrive/check-in/check-out/depart events. State auditors flag arrive→checkout in 90 seconds as evidence no QA was actually performed — a CCR 15307 violation that compounds with every batch processed during the gap. (BPC 26070)

We build the distribution stack from the manifest outward. CCR 15311 transfer workflow wired through the METRC v2 endpoints (incoming, outgoing, rejected, hub). Representative-sampling protocol per the DCC distributor sampling checklist with the licensed Type 8 lab collecting the sample. CCR 15307 QA review documented as a signed decision with a named reviewer. Vehicle and driver files registered through the transporter facility endpoints. Storage premises segregated by status under CCR 15042–15047. Invoicing aligned to the post-AB 195 CDTFA framework. Mock-inspection drills before the first real inspector walks in.

Manifest-clean, handoff by handoff

From CCR 15311 workflow
to every clean CHP stop.

01 · Manifest

Transfer manifest SOP

CCR 15311-compliant manifest workflow; reconciliation with METRC.

02 · Vehicle

Vehicle compliance

Lockable storage, GPS tracking, alarm integration per CCR 15311.

03 · Drivers

Driver qualifications

Driver background, training, route-logging protocol.

04 · QA review

Sampling & QA review

CCR 15307 QA review with named reviewer; representative sampling by the licensed Type 8 lab on premises.

05 · Routes

Route documentation

Route logs, stop confirmation, delivery confirmation per shipment.

06 · Inventory

Inventory-in-transit

Physical-to-digital match for every shipment; hand-off documentation.

07 · Tax

Excise tax compliance

CDTFA transfer-tax treatment; invoicing protocols for retailer customers.

08 · Returns

Returns & destruction

Return shipment protocol; destruction workflow when product fails testing.

09 · Insurance

Cargo insurance

Cannabis-specific cargo coverage, verified against your carrier.

10 · Audit

Distribution audit

Quarterly distribution-specific compliance audit.

Outcomes

What operators
actually get from this.

Deliverables are what we produce. Outcomes are the operational difference those deliverables create — the specific results that follow from the QA review, the manifest workflow, the hub logging, and the excise reconciliation each being done right the first time. Distributors live and die on the quality of their custody chain and the integrity of their METRC record; getting that right keeps you out of both DCC and CDTFA enforcement.

Manifest-match
Every transfer reconciles across three planes: the METRC manifest generated under CCR 15311, the physical inventory verified at scan-on-load, and the retailer’s scan-on-receive record. METRC edits are locked to approved roles, every hub arrive/check-in/check-out/depart event lands inside its expected dwell window, and the driver does not leave the recipient’s premises until the receiving licensee has accepted the transfer in their own integration. The single most common distributor finding — manifest count or weight disagreeing with physical product — is engineered out at the source.
QA-clean
The Type 11 quality-assurance review under CCR 15307 is a documented decision with a named reviewer, not a checkbox — every COA panel verified, every label checked against CCR 15407–15412, every potency claim inside the ±10% tolerance under CCR 15724. Representative sampling is collected by the licensed Type 8 lab on your premises with chain-of-custody documented in METRC. Failed batches route through the pass/fail/destroy/remediate decision tree with remediation@cannabis.ca.gov pre-approval where a manufacturer is the correct destination, and the destruction event posts in METRC under CCR 15048 the same business day.
Tax-clean
CDTFA excise reconciled quarterly against the post-AB 195 framework, where the retailer (not the distributor) collects the 15% excise tax under AB 564 effective Oct 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028. Distributor invoices carry the language that keeps the retailer’s books correct, returned and destroyed-product events post cleanly, and the cultivation-tax sunset (eliminated July 1, 2022 by AB 195) is verified on every line. No retroactive assessments from CDTFA discovery audits, no surprise back-tax exposure when an acquirer runs financial diligence two years out.
The legal backbone

Every recommendation cites a regulation.
No opinion-based compliance.

Citation discipline is the difference between a distribution operation that survives an inspection and one that does not. Every claim in our SOPs — every manifest field, every QA-review checkpoint, every sampling protocol, every storage-segregation rule — resolves to a specific subsection of CCR Title 4 Division 19, a Business & Professions Code section, the post-AB 195 CDTFA framework, or a METRC v2 endpoint. When a DCC inspector asks the source of a manifest practice, we cite CCR 15311. When a CDTFA auditor questions an invoice line, we cite the post-AB 195 framework as amended by AB 564. When counsel reviews our SOPs, the authorities are embedded inline rather than appended as footnotes.

Distributor compliance sits at the intersection of three agencies. State statute (BPC 26050 license types, BPC 26070 distributor obligations, BPC 26069 cannabis waste, AB 195 and AB 564 on excise tax) sets the framework. State regulation (CCR Title 4 Division 19 — 15042–15047 storage and surveillance, 15048 waste, 15307 QA review, 15311 transport and manifests, 15407–15412 packaging and labels, 15724 potency tolerance, 15037 recordkeeping) governs operations. METRC, run by Franwell under DCC oversight, is the system of record for transfers, packages, and the hub workflow — CDTFA reads the data. Each layer must align with the others on every batch; when one drifts, the operation moves backward.

BPC 26050BPC 26070BPC 26069AB 195AB 564CCR 15042–15047CCR 15048CCR 15307CCR 15311CCR 15407–15412CCR 15724CCR 15037METRC v2 transfersMETRC v2 hubForm DCC-LIC-019Form DCC-LIC-021
Frequently asked

Questions we get,
answered directly.

Ready?

One 15-minute call
scopes the engagement.